| 119 | 10 | 24 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的:分析选择性脊神经后根切断术联合生物反馈综合治疗痉挛性脑瘫患儿的临床意义。方法:选择在本院接受治疗的痉挛性脑瘫患儿作为研究对象,随机分为两组,对照组患儿单纯使用选择性脊神经后根切断术,观察组使用选择性脊神经后根切断术联合生物反馈综合治疗,比较两组治疗前后的脑电功率、粗大运动功能评分、肌张力及关节活动度。结果:(1)治疗后,两组患者θ波值及θ/β比值均低于治疗前,β波值高于治疗前,且观察组患者的θ波值及θ/β比值低于对照组,β波值高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);(2)治疗后,两组患者的粗大运动功能量表(GMFM)66项评分值均高于治疗前,且观察组患者的GMFM-66项评分值高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05);(3)治疗后,两组患者的腓肠肌肌张力及足背屈角均低于治疗前,且观察组患者的腓肠肌肌张力及足背屈角均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论:选择性脊神经后根切断术联合生物反馈综合治疗可以有效改善痉挛性脑瘫患儿的脑功能,增强粗大运动功能,同时降低患儿肌张力,增加关节活动度。
Abstract:Objective:To analyze the effect of selective posterior rhizotomy(SPR)combine with biofeedback on patients with spastic cerebral palsy.Methods:Patients with spastic cerebral palsy were selected as research subjects,and were randomly divided into simple the control group with SPR and observation group with SPR combined biofeedback treatment.EEG,gross motor function score,muscle tension and joint activity were detected and compared.Results:After treatment,θwave values andθ/βratios were lower,GMFM-66-score values were higher,and gastrocnemius muscle tension and foot dorsiflexion angle were lower than before,β-wave values was higher than before.θwave in observation groups values andθ/βratio was lower than that of control group,β-wave values was higher.GMFM-66-score values in observation groups was higher than that of control group.Gastrocnemius muscle tension and foot dorsiflexion angle in observation groups were lower than control group.Conclusions:SPR combined biofeedback can effectively improve the brain function of children with spastic cerebral palsy,enhance gross motor function,reduce muscle tension and increase range of motion.
1 高晶,岳虹霓,毛红梅.肌电生物反馈综合治疗促进痉挛性双瘫型脑瘫患儿下肢运动功能的疗效观察[J].中国康复医学杂志,2010,25(1):42-43.
2 李智勇,朱家恺,刘均墀,等.选择性脊神经后根切断术对痉挛性脑瘫运动功能中远期随访疗效分析[J].中华显微外科杂志,2003,26(3):239-240.
3 李雪梅,姜志梅,郭岚敏.脑电生物反馈治疗对痉挛型脑瘫患儿脑功能的改善作用[J].中国康复医学杂志,2012,27(2):138-141.
4 Robinson K G,Mendonca JL,Militar JL,et al.Disruption of Basal lamina components in neuromotor synapses of children with spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy[J].PLoS One,2013,8(8):702-708.
5 陈才,杨少华,洪芳芳,等.生物反馈联合任务导向性训练治疗34例小儿脑性瘫痪的临床研究[J].重庆医学,2009,38(16):2022-2023.
6 蒙辉能,黄恒良,张旭光,等.选择性脊神经后根切断术治疗痉挛性脑瘫的随访分析[J].中国康复医学杂志,2005,20(1):54-55.
7 Dehno NS,Dehkordi SN,Dadgoo M.Association between spasticity and the level of motor function with quality of life in community dwelling Iranian young adults with spastic cerebral palsy[J].Med J Islam Repub Iran,2012,26(4):150-156.
8 莫海英,陶桂花,邓金梅.选择性脊神经后根切断术治疗小儿痉挛性脑瘫的护理[J].中华护理杂志,2004,39(11):827-828.
9 冯纪川,郭宁国,陈志学,等.选择性脊神经后根切断治疗儿童痉挛性脑瘫58例[J].郑州大学学报,2004,39(4):702-703.
10 陈才,杨少华,洪芳芳,等.运动学习联合生物反馈治疗脑性瘫痪的临床研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2009,24(7):610-612.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13210/j.cnki.jhmu.2014.02.031
中图分类号:R748
引用信息:
[1]陈章明.选择性脊神经后根切断术联合生物反馈综合治疗痉挛性脑瘫患儿临床分析[J].海南医学院学报,2014,20(02):244-247.DOI:10.13210/j.cnki.jhmu.2014.02.031.
基金信息:
福州市科技攻关项目(2003-26)~~
2013-11-26
2013-11-26
2013-11-26