| 51 | 16 | 32 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的:探讨氧气驱动雾化吸入布地奈德对急性喉炎的临床疗效。方法:选取河北钢铁集团宣钢职工医院2014年4月~2015年4月收治的70例急性喉炎患者,所有患者随机分为两组,在常规治疗基础上,观察组以氧气驱动雾化吸入布地奈德,对照组以氧气驱动雾化吸入地塞米松治疗。观察治疗前和治疗30min后两组血氧饱和度(SpO2)变化情况、治疗前和治疗3d后血清白细胞介素-4(IL-4)及白细胞介素-8(IL-8)炎症因子变化,观察两组用药后临床症状消失时间及住院时间及临床治疗效果。结果:治疗30min后SpO2改善程度观察组明显优于对照组(P<0.05);治疗3d后观察组IL-4、IL-8水平下降程度明显优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组临床症状消失时间及住院时间少于对照组(P<0.05);观察组总有效率为94.3%,优于对照组的74.3%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:氧气驱动雾化吸入布地奈德治疗急性喉炎可迅速减轻局部炎症反应,改善临床症状,提高用药安全性,值得临床推广。
Abstract:Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy of oxygen-driven atomizing inhalation of budesonide in the treatment of acute laryngitis.Methods:Based on the routine treatment,patients in the observation group were given oxygen-driven atomizing inhalation of budesonide,while the patients in the control group were given oxygen-driven atomizing inhalation of dexamethasone.The change of SpO2 before treatment and 30 min after treatment,the changes of serum IL-4 and IL-8 before treatment and 3d after treatment,the clinical symptom disappearing time,hospitalization time,and clinical therapeutic effect after drug administration in the two groups were observed.Results:The improved degree of SpO2 30 min after treatment in the observation group was more significant than that in the control group(P<0.05).The decreased degree of IL-4 and IL-8 levels 3 dafter treatment in the observation group was more significant than that in the control group(P<0.05).The clinical symptom disappearing time and hospitalization time in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group(P<0.05).The total effective rate in the observation group(94.3%)was significantly higher than that in the control group(74.3%)(P<0.05).Conclusions:Oxygen-driven atomizing inhalation of budesonide in the treatment of acute laryngitis can rapidly alleviate the local inflammatory reaction,improve the clinical symptoms,and enhance the safety of drug administration;therefore,it deserves to be widely recommended in the clinic.
1黄慧婷.150例小儿急性喉炎临床治疗体会[J].中外医学研究,2011,9(36):147.
2 杜克玲,康慧.布地奈德雾化吸入治疗急性喉炎喉梗阻的临床探讨[J].吉林医学,2011,32(20):4133.
3 郭敬民,张沁铭,李燕芳,等.儿童急性喉炎激素优化治疗方案的临床研究[J].海峡医学,2012,24(7):97-99.
4 刘霞,吴文先.布地奈德雾化吸入治疗小儿急性喉炎的疗效观察[J].中国妇幼保健,2010,25(33):4935-4937.
5 郑玉明.小儿急性喉炎72例治疗体会[J].当代医学,2011,17(6):56-57.
6 毛春梅,赵兰壁,田丽君,等.布地奈德混悬液雾化吸入治疗小儿急性喉炎的临床观察[J].现代生物医学进展,2013,13(32):6358-6261.
7 申昆玲,李云珠,李昌崇,等.糖皮质激素雾化吸人疗法在儿科应用的专家共识[J].临床儿科杂志,2011,29(1):86-91.
8 潘成军,林华.布地奈德雾化吸入治疗急性喉炎的疗效及安全性[J].海峡药学,2011,23(11):119-120.
9 黎素清.雾化吸入布地奈德治疗急性喉炎临床疗效观察[J].中国实用医药,2010,5(29):150.
10 胡文红.布地奈德与地塞米松雾化吸入治疗急性喉炎临床疗效比较[J].安徽医药,2013,17(5):839-840.
11 李争荣.布地奈德雾化吸入治疗小儿急性喉炎临床疗效对比研究[J].中国医药导报,2012,9(7):64-66.
12 吴湘明,冯勇军,曾春荣.氧气驱动雾化吸入盐酸布地奈德治疗急性喉炎的疗效及安全性研究[J].检验医学与临床,2014,11(12):1644-1645.
13 杨伟丽.超强氧气雾化吸入对急性喉炎患儿血氧饱和度的影响[J].吉林医学,2015,36(1):158-159.
14 程艳慧,张勇,何东初.COPD患者血清IL-4、IL-8、TNF-α、CC16水平变化与气道炎症损伤的探讨[J].临床肺科杂志,2010,15(5):661-663.
15 周始明.雾化吸入布地奈德混悬液治疗小儿急性喉炎78例临床观察[J].海南医学,2014,25(10):1508-1510.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13210/j.cnki.jhmu.20150928.007
中图分类号:R767.11
引用信息:
[1]张磊.氧气驱动雾化吸入布地奈德治疗急性喉炎的疗效研究[J].海南医学院学报,2016,22(02):206-208.DOI:10.13210/j.cnki.jhmu.20150928.007.
基金信息:
河北钢铁集团科学技术项目(2013019202)~~
2015-09-28
2015-09-28
2015-09-28