| 235 | 20 | 24 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的:探讨血清总IgE、外周血嗜酸性粒细胞(EOS)及肺功能水平检测在儿童咳嗽变异性哮喘(CVA)诊断中的价值。方法:选择CVA发作期、哮喘急性发作期患儿各35例,以及健康对照患儿35例,分别检测3组儿童血清总IgE、外周血EOS绝对值以及肺功能水平,并进行对比分析。结果:CVA组与哮喘组患儿的血清总IgE、外周血EOS绝对值显著高于健康对照组;CVA组与哮喘组患儿EV1%、FEV1/FVC%、PEF%水平虽低于健康对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而FEF25%、FEF50%、FEF75%水平均低于对照组(均P<0.01);吸药后,CVA组与哮喘组患儿FEF25%、FEF50%、FEF75%水平均较吸药前明显改善(均P<0.01),而对照组吸药前、后各指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:对疑似CVA患儿进行血清总IgE、外周血EOS,以及支气管舒张试验检查可有效提高确诊率,且安全快速,适合临床推广应用。
Abstract：Objective: To explore the value of total IgE,EOS and pulmonary function detection in diagnosis of cough variant asthma(CVA) in children.Methods : A total of 35 cases of children with CVA and 35 cases with asthma in attack stage were selected,another 35 cases of healthy children were selected as the control group.The levels of serum total IgE,peripheral blood EOS and pulmonary function were detected and analyzed.Results: The levels of total IgE and EOS in CVA group and asthma group were obviously higher than that in control group.The levels of EV1%,FEV1/FVC% and PEF% in CVA group and asthma group were lower than that in control group,but there was no obvious difference.The levels of FEF25%,FEF50% and FEF75% in CVA group and asthma group were obviously lower than that in control group.After inhalation,the levels of FEF25%,FEF50% and FEF75% in CVA group and asthma group obviously improved than that before inhalation,but there was no obvious difference in levels of every index in control group before and after inhalation.Conclusion: The detection of serum total IgE,peripheral blood EOS and pulmonary function in children with suspected CVA can increase the accuracy of diagnosis,and shows high security and safety.It's worth to be popularized.
1 Lee BJ,Jeung YJ,Lee JY,et al.Increased S-nitroso-thiol levels in nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis com-pared with cough variant asthma[J].Int Arch AllergyImmunol,2011,156(1):99-103.
2 Kita T,Fujimura M,Ogawa H,et al.Antitussiveeffects of the leukotriene receptor antagonist monte-lukast in patients with cough variant asthma and atopiccough[J].Allergol Int,2010,59(2):185-192.
3陆再英,钟南山.内科学[M].第7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.52.
4中华医学会儿科学会呼吸学组、《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会.儿童支气管哮喘诊断与防治指南[J].中华儿科杂志,2008,46(10):745-753.
5 Matsuoka H,Niimi A,Matsumoto H,et al.Inflamma-tory subtypes in cough-variant asthma:association withmaintenance doses of inhaled corticosteroids[J].Chest,2010,138(6):1418-1425.
6 Meng YN,Rao HP,Chen YP,et al.Serum IgE and e-osinophil cationic protein levels in children with coughvariant asthma[J].Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi,2008,10(3):399-400.
7黄漾,邱志宏,魏为利,等.咳嗽敏感性和咳嗽变异性哮喘的比较研究[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2011,32(1):68-72.
8 Tamaoki J,Yokohori N,Tagaya E,et al.Comparableeffect of a leukotriene receptor antagonist and long-act-ing beta臥-adrenergic agonist in cough variant asthma[J].Allergy Asthma Proc,2010,31(5):78-84.
9 Yu ZW,Xie JJ,Qian J,et al.Roles of allergen testingin vitro and impulse oscillometry for lung function meas-urements in children with cough variant asthma[J].Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi,2011,13(7):554-557
基本信息:
DOI：10.13210/j.cnki.jhmu.2012.06.041
中图分类号:R725.6
引用信息:
[1]李庆忠.血清总IgE、外周血EOS及肺功能在儿童咳嗽变异性哮喘诊断中的价值[J].海南医学院学报,2012,18(06):848-851.DOI:10.13210/j.cnki.jhmu.2012.06.041.
基金信息:
中国高校医学期刊临床专项资金项目(112210204)~~
2012-03-02
2012-03-02
2012-03-02