nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2023, 18, v.29 1411-1415
不同剂量阿芬太尼用于无痛胃镜检查有效性及安全性的临床观察
基金项目(Foundation): 湖北陈孝平科技发展基金会围术期镇痛药阿芬太尼专项基金(CXPJJH12000010); 海南省卫生健康行业科研项目(20A200263)~~
邮箱(Email): ahong1818@126.com;
DOI: 10.13210/j.cnki.jhmu.20230717.001
摘要:

目的:观察不同剂量的阿芬太尼联合丙泊酚用于无痛胃镜检查的有效剂量及安全性。方法:选择2021年1月~2021年12月行无痛胃镜检查的患者240例,随机数字表法分为对照组、阿芬太尼不同剂量组(N1组、N2组、N3组、N4组和N5组,注射剂量分别为5、6、7、8和10μg/kg),各40例。对照组采用丙泊酚注射麻醉,阿芬太尼不同剂量组采用不同剂量的阿芬太尼复合丙泊酚麻醉。检查完毕评估麻醉效果。比较各组心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、呼吸暂停时间、胃镜置入不耐受反应发生率及不良反应。结果:与给药前比较,胃镜置入前各组的SBP和HR均降低(P<0.01);胃镜置入后1 min时对照组SBP和HR均升高(P<0.01),N3、N4组SBP降低(P<0.01),HR无变化(P>0.05),N5组SBP和HR均降低(P<0.01)。与胃镜置入前比较,在胃镜置入后1 min时,对照组、N1、N2和N3组的SBP和HR均升高(P<0.01),N4和N5组SBP和HR均无明显变化(P>0.05)。阿芬太尼不同剂量组呼吸暂停时间均低于对照组(P<0.01),N5组呼吸暂停时间高于N1组、N2组、N3组、N4组(P<0.01)。6组胃镜置入不耐受反应发生率以及呛咳反应、干呕反射、吞咽反射及肢体反应率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);6组无痛胃镜检查后瘙痒、恶心呕吐、焦虑烦躁、头晕嗜睡及腹泻便秘发生率差异无统计意义(P>0.05)。结论:8μg/kg阿芬太尼联合丙泊酚用于无痛胃镜检查时麻醉效果确切,呼吸循环稳定,不良反应发生率低。

Abstract:

Objective: To observe the effective dose and safety of different doses of alfentanil combined with propofol in painless gastroscopy. Methods: A total of 240 patients who underwent painless gastric examination from January 2021 to December 2021 were randomly divided into a control group and a different dose group of alfentanil(N1 group, N2 group, N3 group, N4group, and N5 group, with injection doses of 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10 μg/kg, respectively) using a number table method, with 40 patients in each group. The control group was anesthetized with propofol injection, while different dosage groups of alfentanil were anesthetized with different doses of alfentanil combined with propofol. Evaluating the anesthesia effect after the examination is completed. The heart rate(HR), systolic blood pressure(SBP), apnea time, incidence of intolerance to gastroscopy insertion, and adverse reactions in each group were compared. Results: Compared with before administration, SBP and HR in all groups decreased before gastroscopy placement(P<0.01); At 1 minute after gastroscopy insertion, both SBP and HR in the control group increased(P<0.01), while SBP in the N3 and N4 groups decreased(P<0.01), while HR remained unchanged(P>0.05). Both SBP and HR in the N5 group decreased(P<0.01). Compared with before gastroscopy insertion, SBP and HR in the control group, N1, N2, and N3 groups increased 1 minute after gastroscopy insertion(P<0.01), while there was no significant change in SBP and HR in the N4 and N5 groups(P>0.05).The apnea time of different dosage groups of alfentanil was lower than that of the control group(P<0.01), and the apnea time of N5 group was higher than that of N1 group, N2 group, N3 group, and N4group(P<0.01).There was no significant difference in the incidence of intolerant reactions during gastroscopy insertion, cough reaction, retching reflex, swallowing reflex and limb movement reaction rate between the six groups(P>0.05); there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of itching, nausea, vomiting, anxiety, dizziness, drowsiness, diarrhea, and constipation after painless gastroscopy examination among the six groups(P>0.05). Conclusion: The combination of 8 μg/kg alfentanil and propofol has a definite anesthesia effect, stable respiratory and circulatory system, and low incidence of adverse reactions when used for painless gastroscopy.

参考文献

1中华医学会消化内镜学分会麻醉协助组.常见消化内镜手术麻醉管理专家共识[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2019,35(2):177-185.

2 李娟娟.布托啡诺联合丙泊酚在无痛胃肠镜检查中的应用[J].医学理论与实践,2019,32(8):1193-1195.

3 Jin R,Shi H,Liu H. Construction of narcotic drug management process in painless gastroenteroscopy under the principle of rationality,safety and standardization[J].Pharmaceut Care Res,2020,20(6):469-471.

4 刘芳,俞晨.纳洛酮对老年患者无痛肠镜麻醉后苏醒质量和认知功能的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志,2021,25(9):78-81.

5 Wang Q,Long ZB,Qian M,et al. The 486th case:Chronic diarrhea and orthostatic hypotension[J]. Chin J int med,2021,60(3):284-288.

6 田浩,张艺,熊永红,等.依托咪酯和丙泊酚用于无痛结肠镜时麻醉效果的Meta分析[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2021,37(11):1182-1189.

7 郝冬,张锦.利多卡因气雾剂复合利多卡因及丙泊酚静脉麻醉在无痛胃镜检查中的应用[J].实用药物与临床,2021,24(2):150-152.

8 Yanagiya R,Toubai T,Kabasawa T,et al.Two-year remission of a relapsed primary gastric peripheral T-cell lymphoma treated with total gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy[J].RinshōKetsueki,2021,62(2):79-84.

9 陶飞雪,夏书江,高红霞,等.预输液体对无痛肠镜检查过程中血流动力学的影响[J].中国临床保健杂志,2020,23(2):278-281.

10 余红春,江婷婷,贾洪峰.地佐辛与舒芬太尼复合丙泊酚在无痛肠镜麻醉中的应用效果比较[J].重庆医学,2020,49(14):2360-2362.

11 高培珍,陈彪.丁卡因含服复合静脉麻醉在超重或肥胖者无痛清醒胃镜检查中的应用观察[J].山东医药,2020,60(13):49-52.

12 吴艳,孟凡浩,冯硕,等.脑电双频指数监测在老年患者无痛胃肠镜麻醉中的应用效果[J].北京医学,2021,43(8):820-822.

13 卢月霞,蔡亲峰.纳布啡复合丙泊酚麻醉在老年患者无痛胃镜检查中的应用及对患者认知功能的影响[J].中国内镜杂志,2021,27(7):20-25.

14 Unal O,Mehmet C,Fatih A,et al. Comparison of safety and efficiency of general,spinal and epidural anesthesia methods used for the endoscopic surgical treatment of ureteral stones:Which one is better to access the ureter and reach the stone?[J]. Urol J,2020,17(3):237-242.

15 柴天波,杨川,赵泽宇,等.不同剂量纳布啡复合丙泊酚静脉麻醉用于老年无痛胃镜的效果及对神经认知紊乱的影响[J].中国医药导报,2020,17(31):126-129,157.

16 李沛函,李丽,杨彦伟,等.超重患者行无痛胃镜麻醉中舒芬太尼和丙泊酚最佳给药时间间隔的临床观察[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2020,19(13):1362-1364.

17 陈少谊,黄萍,陆治杏,等.小剂量瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚麻醉用于老年患者无痛胃镜检查的临床观察[J].老年医学与保健,2020,26(1):53-55,67.

18 王国庆.阿芬太尼与舒芬太尼辅助丙泊酚持续静脉泵注在无痛肠镜检查中的麻醉效果比较[J].检验医学与临床,2022,19(3):405-408.

19 Orestis L,Yusef M,Matthias M,et al. Coincidental detection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors during laparoscopic bariatric procedures-data and treatment strategy of a German reference center[J].Obes Surg,2020,29(6):1858-1866.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13210/j.cnki.jhmu.20230717.001

中图分类号:R614

引用信息:

[1]张娇,陈锐,李媛,等.不同剂量阿芬太尼用于无痛胃镜检查有效性及安全性的临床观察[J].海南医学院学报,2023,29(18):1411-1415.DOI:10.13210/j.cnki.jhmu.20230717.001.

基金信息:

湖北陈孝平科技发展基金会围术期镇痛药阿芬太尼专项基金(CXPJJH12000010); 海南省卫生健康行业科研项目(20A200263)~~

发布时间:

2023-07-18

出版时间:

2023-07-18

网络发布时间:

2023-07-18

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文